Al voor de SCUA ten onder ging, bra

Al voor de SCUA ten onder ging, brachten de Britten het probleem van het Suezkanaal op 5 oktober voor bij de Veiligheidsraad van de Verenigde Naties (VN). Er bestond geen enkele garantie dat Groot-Brittannië in de Veiligheidsraad verder zou komen, omdat Rusland, evenals de andere permanente leden van deze raad, vetorecht bezat. Toch was enige haast geboden: als Rusland de zaak eerder voorbracht, stond Groot-Brittannië in de beklaagdenbank als onderdrukker van een soevereine natie. Het is twijfelachtig of Eden dacht dat de Veiligheidsraad Nasser daadwerkelijk kon doen gehoorzamen. Eerder leek de VN een laatste horde voordat militaire actie een serieuze mogelijkheid werd. Toch jaagde Eden, een fervent diplomaat, begin oktober een mogelijke diplomatieke oplossing van het conflict serieus na. Egypte leek enkele concessies te gaan accepteren en Eden zag dit als een voldoende middel om Nasser gezicht te doen verliezen.

Αποτελέσματα (Αγγλικά) 1:

Even before the SCUA fell, the British brought the problem of the Suez Canal on 5 October for at the Security Council of the United Nations (UN). There was no guarantee that Britain would come further in the Security Council because Russia, as well as the other permanent members of this Council, veto possessed. Yet it was some urgency: If Russia voorbracht the case earlier, Great Britain stood in the dock as oppressor of a sovereign nation. It is questionable whether Eden thought Nasser could actually do obey the Security Council. The UN previously seemed a final hurdle before military action was a serious possibility. Anyway drove Eden, a staunch diplomat, at the beginning of October, a possible diplomatic solution to the conflict seriously. Egypt seemed to accept some concessions and Eden saw this as a sufficient means of Nasser face.

Αποτελέσματα (Αγγλικά) 2:

As for the SCUA went under, the British brought the problem of the Suez Canal on October 5 for the United Nations Security Council (UN). There was no guarantee that Britain would move forward in the Security Council because Russia and the other permanent members of the board, veto possessed. Yet some urgency if Russia the matter brought before, Britain stood in the dock as a suppressor of a sovereign nation. It is doubtful whether Eden thought that the Security Nasser could actually obey. Earlier, the UN seemed a last hurdle before military action was a serious possibility. Still hunted Eden, a staunch diplomat early October a possible diplomatic solution to the conflict seriously after. Egypt seemed to accept some concessions and Eden saw this as a sufficient means of doing Nasser lose face.

Αποτελέσματα (Αγγλικά) 3:

for the scua went under, the british brought the problem of the suez canal on 5 october at the security council of the united nations (un). there was no guarantee that britain would continue in the security council, russia, as well as the other permanent members of the council, which owned. it was only in a hurry, as russia has become the case earlier, britain was in the dock as a suppressor of a sovereign nation. it is doubtful whether eden thought the security council nasser could actually do obey. before the un was a final hurdle before military action was a serious possibility. it was a great diplomat, eden, beginning october a diplomatic solution to the conflict seriously. egypt seemed to accept concessions and eden saw this as a sufficient means to nasser to lose face.